4.4 Article

Closing the window for compressed dark sectors with disappearing charged tracks

Journal

JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS
Volume -, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP06(2017)119

Keywords

Beyond Standard Model; Supersymmetric Standard Model

Funding

  1. ERC [614577]
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation under MHV grant [171330]
  3. DFG Cluster of Excellence PRISMA [EXC 1098]
  4. European Research Council (ERC) [614577] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We investigate the sensitivity at current and future hadron colliders to a heavy electrically-charged particle with a proper decay length below a centimetre, whose decay products are invisible due to below-threshold energies and/or small couplings to the Standard Model. A cosmologically-motivated example of a framework that contains such a particle is the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model in the limit of pure Higgsinos. The current hadron-collider search strategy has no sensitivity to the upper range of pure-Higgsino masses that are consistent with the thermal relic density, even at a future collider with 100 TeV centre-of-mass energy. We show that performing a disappearing track search within the inner 10 cm of detector volume would improve the reach in lifetime by a factor of 3 at the 14 TeV LHC and a further factor of 5 at a 100 TeV collider, resulting in around 10 events for 1.1 TeV thermal Higgsinos. In order to include the particles with the largest boost in the analysis, we furthermore propose a purely track-based search in both the central and forward regions, each of which would increase the number of events by another factor of 5, improving our reach at small lifetimes. This would allow us to de finitively discover or exclude the experimentally-elusive pure-Higgsino thermal relic at a 100 TeV collider. Our results illustrate the importance of varying detector design when assessing the reach of future high energy colliders.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available