4.7 Article

Zonisamide suppresses endoplasmic reticulum stress-induced neuronal cell damage in vitro and in vivo

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 746, Issue -, Pages 301-307

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2014.09.023

Keywords

Endoplasmic reticulum stress; Parkinson's disease; Zonisamide

Funding

  1. Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Co., Ltd (Osaka, Japan)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Zonisamide has been reported to have protective effects on epilepsy and Parkinson's disease and to work via various mechanisms of action, such as inhibition of monoamine oxidase-B and enhancement of tyrosine hydroxylase. Recently, it has been suggested that zonisamide itself shows neuroprotective actions. Therefore, in the present study we investigated the neuroprotective effects of zonisamide against endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress. We used human neuroblastoma (SH-SY5Y) cells and investigated the protective effects of zonisamide against tunicamycin- and thapsigargin-induced neuronal cell death. In addition, we investigated the effect of zonisamide against 1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium (MPP+)-induced cell death and the mechanism of protection against ER stress. In vivo, we investigated the effect of zonisamide (20 mg/kg, p.o.) in the 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1, 2, 3, 6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP)-inducecl mouse model of Parkinson's disease. Zonisamide not only suppressed MPP+-induced cell death, but also inhibited ER stress-induced cell death and suppressed the expression of ER stress-related factors such as C/EBO homologous protein (CHOP) in vivo. Furthermore, zonisamide inhibited the activation of caspase-3 in vitro. These results suggest that zonisamide affected ER stress via caspase-3. We think that ER stress, particularly the mechanism via caspase-3, is involved in part of the neuroprotective effect of zonisamide against the experimental models of Parkinson's disease. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available