4.0 Article

Confidence intervals for heritability via Haseman-Elston regression

Journal

Publisher

WALTER DE GRUYTER GMBH
DOI: 10.1515/sagmb-2016-0076

Keywords

meta-analysis; proportions of variance; quadratic forms; variance components

Funding

  1. NHLBI [HHSN268201300005C]
  2. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) [N01-HC65233]
  3. University of Miami [N01-HC65234]
  4. Albert Einstein College of Medicine [N01-HC65235]
  5. Northwestern University [N01-HC65236]
  6. San Diego State University [N01-HC65237]
  7. HCHS/SOL

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Heritability is the proportion of phenotypic variance in a population that is attributable to individual genotypes. Heritability is considered an important measure in both evolutionary biology and in medicine, and is routinely estimated and reported in genetic epidemiology studies. In population-based genome-wide association studies (GWAS), mixed models are used to estimate variance components, from which a heritability estimate is obtained. The estimated heritability is the proportion of the model's total variance that is due to the genetic relatedness matrix (kinship measured from genotypes). Current practice is to use bootstrapping, which is slow, or normal asymptotic approximation to estimate the precision of the heritability estimate; however, this approximation fails to hold near the boundaries of the parameter space or when the sample size is small. In this paper we propose to estimate variance components via a Haseman-Elston regression, find the asymptotic distribution of the variance components and proportions of variance, and use them to construct confidence intervals (CIs). Our method is further developed to obtain unbiased variance components estimators and construct CIs by meta-analyzing information from multiple studies. We demonstrate our approach on data from the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos (HCHS/SOL).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available