4.1 Article

Dexamethasone intravitreal implant for diabetic macular edema: indications for a PRN regimen of treatment

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages 347-351

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.5301/ejo.5000563

Keywords

Dexamethasone intravitreal implant; Diabetic macular edema; Diabetic retinopathy; PRN regimen

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To define the mean time of first recurrence of diabetic macular edema (DME) after a single injection of dexamethasone intravitreal implant (DEX-I), reducing the burden of monthly visits during a PRN regimen of treatment. Methods: Twenty phakic eyes with DME (12 eyes naive and 8 eyes with edema persistent after previous treatments) were followed monthly after DEX-I injection until evidence of first recurrence of edema, defined as a change in visual acuity (VA) >= 5 letters and/or in foveal thickness (FT) >= 50 mu m. Reaching this point, the eyes were re-treated. Monitored parameters were changes in VA, FT, intraocular pressure (IOP), and lens opacity. Results: Maximal efficacy was registered at month 1, when mean VA improved by 14 letters (19%), FT decreased by 325 mu m (43.7%), and in 15 eyes (75%) edema was completely reabsorbed. The mean time of first recurrence was 5.1 months. No statistical difference was found between eyes with naive or persistent DME. Five eyes needed topical medication for modest temporary IOP increase (21-24 mm Hg) between months 2 and 4. No increase in lens opacities was registered during follow-up. Conclusions: According to the results of this study, the first signs of DME recurrence after DEX-I injection appear at a mean time of 5 months, suggesting that an appropriate and prudent time schedule for a PRN regimen could be limited to monthly tonometry and a first complete examination not before 4 months.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available