4.5 Article

Measuring Price Elasticities of Demand and Supply of Water Entitlements Based on Stated and Revealed Preference Data

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS
Volume 98, Issue 1, Pages 314-332

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/ajae/aav022

Keywords

Contingent behavior; irrigation; price elasticity; water entitlements; water markets

Funding

  1. Department of Environment
  2. Australian Research Council [DP140103946, LP0990429]
  3. Australian Research Council [LP0990429] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Estimates of price elasticities of water entitlements (known as permanent water or water rights in the United States) are complicated by data limitations and problems of endogeneity. To overcome these issues, we develop an approach to generate stated preference data and combine them with revealed preference data to estimate price elasticities from various types of water entitlement sales in the southern Murray-Darling Basin, Australia. Our results suggest that price elasticities of demand and supply of high security water entitlements are inelastic in the relevant market price range between AUD >2,100 per mega-liter, and that supply is relatively more inelastic than demand. For lower reliability water entitlements, the price elasticity of demand is estimated to be even more inelastic than high security water entitlements. The price elasticity of supply for general security water entitlements is similar to high security water entitlements, while the supply of low reliability water entitlements is extremely inelastic for our data set. The comparison between the stated and revealed preference data provides strong evidence of support for a data fusion approach; nevertheless, some differences in water sale preferences were found for irrigators choosing not to sell all of their water. The consistency of our results signals support for the use of this methodology in other water basins around the world.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available