4.5 Article

The New Nordic Diet: phosphorus content and absorption

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
Volume 55, Issue 3, Pages 991-996

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00394-015-0913-2

Keywords

New Nordic Diet; Dietary phosphorus intake; Fractional phosphorus excretion; Plasma phosphorus; Urinary phosphorus excretion

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose High phosphorus content in the diet may have adverse effect on cardiovascular health. We investigated whether the New Nordic Diet (NND), based mainly on local, organic and less processed food and large amounts of fruit, vegetables, wholegrain and fish, versus an Average Danish Diet (ADD) would reduce the phosphorus load due to less phosphorus-containing food additives, animal protein and more plant-based proteins. Methods Phosphorus and creatinine were measured in plasma and urine at baseline, week 12 and week 26 in 132 centrally obese subjects with normal renal function as part of a post hoc analysis of data acquired from a 26-week controlled trial. We used the fractional phosphorus excretion as a measurement of phosphorus absorption. Results Mean baseline fractional phosphorus excretion was 20.9 +/- A 6.6 % in the NND group (n = 82) and 20.8 +/- A 5.5 % in the ADD group (n = 50) and was decreased by 2.8 +/- A 5.1 and 3.1 +/- A 5.4 %, respectively, (p = 0.6) at week 26. At week 26, the mean change in plasma phosphorus was 0.04 +/- A 0.12 mmol/L in the NND group and -0.03 +/- A 0.13 mmol/L in the ADD group (p = 0.001). Mean baseline phosphorus intake was 1950 +/- A 16 mg/10 MJ in the NND group and 1968 +/- A 22 mg/10 MJ in the ADD group and decreased less in the NND compared to the ADD (67 +/- A 36 mg/10 MJ and -266 +/- A 45 mg/day, respectively, p < 0.298). Conclusion Contrary to expectations, the NND had a high phosphorus intake and did not decrease the fractional phosphorus excretion compared with ADD. Further modifications of the diet are needed in order to make this food concept beneficial regarding phosphorus absorption.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available