4.7 Article

A Non-natural Protein Rescues Cells Deleted for a Key Enzyme in Central Metabolism

Journal

ACS SYNTHETIC BIOLOGY
Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages 694-700

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssynbio.6b00336

Keywords

de novo proteins; synthetic biology; binary code; auxotrophic E. coli; gltA; prpC

Funding

  1. NSF [MCB-1050510]
  2. NSF Graduate Research Fellowship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An important goal of synthetic biology is to create novel proteins that provide life-sustaining functions in living organisms. Recent attempts to produce novel proteins have focused largely on rational design involving significant computational efforts. In contrast, nature does not design sequences a priori. Instead, nature relies on Darwinian evolution to select biologically functional sequences from nondesigned sequence space. To mimic natural selection in the laboratory, we combed through libraries of novel sequences and selected proteins that rescue E. coli cells deleted for conditionally essential genes. One such gene, gltA, encodes citrate synthase, the enzyme responsible for metabolic entry into the citric acid cycle. The de novo protein SynGItA was isolated as a rescuer of Ag/tA. However, SynGRA is not an enzyme. Instead, SynGItA allows cells to recover from a defect in central carbon and energy metabolism by altering the regulation of an alternative metabolic pathway. Specifically, SynG1tA dramatically enhances the expression of prpC, a gene encoding methylcitrate synthase in the propionate degradation pathway. This endogenous protein has promiscuous catalytic activity, which when overexpressed, compensates for the deletion of citrate synthase. While the molecular details responsible for this overexpression have not been elucidated, the results clearly demonstrate that non-natural proteins unrelated to sequences in nature can provide life-sustaining functions by altering gene regulation in natural organisms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available