4.2 Review

Carcinogenicity of ethylene oxide: key findings and scientific issues

Journal

TOXICOLOGY MECHANISMS AND METHODS
Volume 28, Issue 5, Pages 386-396

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/15376516.2017.1414343

Keywords

Assessment; cancer/tumors; breast cancer; epidemiology; review; integrated risk information system; mode of action; ethylene oxide; mutagenesis; genotoxicity

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In support of the Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS), the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) completed an evaluation of the inhalation carcinogenicity of ethylene oxide (EtO) in December 2016. This article reviews key findings and scientific issues regarding the carcinogenicity of EtO in EPA's Carcinogenicity Assessment. EPA's assessment critically reviewed and characterized epidemiologic, laboratory animal, and mechanistic studies pertaining to the human carcinogenicity of EtO, and addressed some key scientific issues such as the analysis of mechanistic data as part of the cancer hazard evaluation and to inform the quantitative risk assessment. The weight of evidence from the epidemiologic, laboratory animal, and mechanistic studies supports a conclusion that EtO is carcinogenic in humans, with the strongest human evidence linking EtO exposure to lymphoid and breast cancers. Analyses of the mechanistic data establish a key role for genotoxicity and mutagenicity in EtO-induced carcinogenicity and reveal little evidence supporting other mode-of-action hypotheses. In conclusion, EtO was found to be carcinogenic to humans by inhalation, posing a potential human health hazard for lymphoid and breast cancers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

Review Environmental Sciences

Key Characteristics of Carcinogens as a Basis for Organizing Data on Mechanisms of Carcinogenesis

Martyn T. Smith, Kathryn Z. Guyton, Catherine F. Gibbons, Jason M. Fritz, Christopher J. Portier, Ivan Rusyn, David M. DeMarini, Jane C. Caldwell, Robert J. Kavlock, Paul F. Lambert, Stephen S. Hecht, John R. Bucher, Bernard W. Stewart, Robert A. Baan, Vincent J. Cogliano, Kurt Straif

ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES (2016)

Review Environmental Sciences

A framework and case studies for evaluation of enzyme ontogeny in children's health risk evaluation

Gary Ginsberg, Suryanarayana V. Vulimiri, Yu-Sheng Lin, Jayaram Kancherla, Brenda Foos, Babasaheb Sonawane

JOURNAL OF TOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH-PART A-CURRENT ISSUES (2017)

Review Toxicology

Carcinogenicity of ethylene oxide: key findings and scientific issues

Jennifer Jinot, Jason M. Fritz, Suryanarayana V. Vulimiri, Nagalakshmi Keshava

TOXICOLOGY MECHANISMS AND METHODS (2018)

Editorial Material Environmental Sciences

Introduction: Special Issue on Transplacental/Transgenerational Mutagenesis and Carcinogenesis

Suryanarayana V. Vulimiri, Ofelia Olivero

ENVIRONMENTAL AND MOLECULAR MUTAGENESIS (2019)

Review Environmental Sciences

Application of systematic evidence mapping to assess the impact of new research when updating health reference values: A case example using acrolein

Channa Keshava, J. Allen Davis, John Stanek, Kristina A. Thayer, Audrey Galizia, Nagalakshmi Keshava, Jeff Gift, Suryanarayana V. Vulimiri, George Woodall, Carolyn Gigot, Kelly Garcia, Andrew Greenhalgh, Brittany Schulz, Savannah Volkoff, Krisa Camargo, Amanda S. Persad

ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL (2020)

Review Environmental Sciences

Health Effects of Naphthalene Exposure: A Systematic Evidence Map and Analysis of Potential Considerations for Dose-Response Evaluation

Erin E. Yost, Audrey Galizia, Dustin F. Kapraun, Amanda S. Persad, Suryanarayana V. Vulimiri, Michelle Angrish, Janice S. Lee, Ingrid L. Druwe

Summary: The study summarized literature on naphthalene toxicity, indicating that animal studies are more suitable for deriving reference values.

ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES (2021)

Article Environmental Sciences

Systematic evidence map (SEM) template: Report format and methods used for the US EPA Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) program, Provisional Peer Reviewed Toxicity Value (PPRTV) program, and other fit for purpose literature-based human health analyses

Kristina A. Thayer, Michelle Angrish, Xabier Arzuaga, Laura M. Carlson, Allen Davis, Laura Dishaw, Ingrid Druwe, Catherine Gibbons, Barbara Glenn, Ryan Jones, J. Phillip Kaiser, Channa Keshava, Nagalakshmi Keshava, Andrew Kraft, Lucina Lizarraga, Amanda Persad, Elizabeth G. Radke, Glenn Rice, Brittany Schulz, Rachel M. Shaffer, Teresa Shannon, Andrew Shapiro, Shane Thacker, Suryanarayana V. Vulimiri, Antony J. Williams, George Woodall, Erin Yost, Robyn Blain, Katherine Duke, Alexandra E. Goldstone, Pam Hartman, Kevin Hobbie, Brandall Ingle, Courtney Lemeris, Cynthia Lin, Alex Lindahl, Kristen McKinley, Parnian Soleymani, Nicole Vetter

Summary: This article describes the typical methods used to produce systematic evidence maps (SEMs) for the IRIS and PPRTV Programs. It provides examples of applications and workflows for rapid production of SEMs, as well as methods for literature search, screening, and data extraction. The article also presents approaches for study evaluation and offers interactive visual formats and downloadable data.

ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL (2022)

Article Environmental Sciences

Use of systematic evidence maps within the US environmental protection agency (EPA) integrated risk information system (IRIS) program: Advancements to date and looking ahead

Kristina A. Thayer, Rachel M. Shaffer, Michelle Angrish, Xabier Arzuaga, Laura M. Carlson, Allen Davis, Laura Dishaw, Ingrid Druwe, Catherine Gibbons, Barbara Glenn, Ryan Jones, J. Phillip Kaiser, Channa Keshava, Nagalakshmi Keshava, Andrew Kraft, Lucina Lizarraga, Kristan Markey, Amanda Persad, Elizabeth G. Radke, Glenn Rice, Brittany Schulz, Teresa Shannon, Andrew Shapiro, Shane Thacker, Suryanarayana Vulimiri, George Woodall, Erin Yost

Summary: Systematic evidence maps (SEMs) are increasingly utilized in the environmental health field to enhance transparency and efficiency in data gathering, and to promote coordination and sharing among the community.

ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL (2022)

Meeting Abstract Environmental Sciences

Application of Systematic Evidence Mapping to Identify the Potential Human Health Hazards of Azo Dyes

Channa Keshava, Vulimiri V. Suryanarayana, Suna Nicolai, Florenz A. Cruz, Ariane Lenzner, Patrick Tarnow, Narges Ghoreishi, Sven Knueppel, Amanda S. Persad, Kristina A. Thayer, Antony J. Williams, Nancy Baker, Jens T. Vanselow, Ralph Pirow

ENVIRONMENTAL AND MOLECULAR MUTAGENESIS (2022)

Meeting Abstract Environmental Sciences

Inorganic Mercury Salts - Mercuric Chloride, Mercuric Sulfide and Mercurous Chloride: Systematic Review and Analysis

Nagalakshmmi Keshava, Brittany Schulz, Suryanarayana V. Vulimiri, Jeff Gift, Geoffrey Peterson, Catheryne Chiang, Chelsea A. Weitekamp, David M. Lehmann, Amanda S. Persad, Yu-Sheng Lin, Anuradha Mudipalli, Michelle Angrish, Andrew Hotchkiss, Kristina A. Thayer

ENVIRONMENTAL AND MOLECULAR MUTAGENESIS (2022)

Meeting Abstract Environmental Sciences

Systematic Evidence Mapping for Updating Health Reference Values: A Case Example Using Acrolein.

C. Keshava, A. Davis, J. Stanek, K. Thayer, A. Galizia, N. Keshava, J. Gift, S. V. Vulimiri, G. Woodall, C. Gigot, A. Greenhalgh, Z. B. Schult, S. Volkoff, K. Camargo, A. S. Persad

ENVIRONMENTAL AND MOLECULAR MUTAGENESIS (2019)

Meeting Abstract Environmental Sciences

Environmental Transplacental Carcinogens: Human Health Risk Evaluation.

S. V. Vulimiri

ENVIRONMENTAL AND MOLECULAR MUTAGENESIS (2016)

No Data Available