4.7 Article

Practical recommendations for the process of proposing, planning and writing a neurological management guideline by EAN task forces

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY
Volume 22, Issue 12, Pages 1505-1510

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/ene.12818

Keywords

clinical practice guideline; conflict of interests; GRADE; grading evidence; neurological diseases; neurological societies; recommendations

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The European Academy of Neurology (EAN), founded in 2014 after the merging of the two previously active European Neurological Societies, considers the production of neurological guidelines a major obligation, as this is a major tool to improve clinical practice in neurology. This paper updates practical suggestions to develop guidelines about the treatment and diagnosis of neurological diseases within the framework of the EAN. Its aim is to make uniform, traceable and explicit the path from the decision to write an EAN guideline to its publication. We explain the protocol structure, handling of conflicts of interest, format, timeline and process of revision and acceptance. It provides the view of the Scientific Committee and the Board of the EAN. We hope to make easier a larger involvement of the EAN scientific community in producing guidelines.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available