4.7 Article

Gastric microbiome of Indian patients with Helicobacter pylori infection, and their interaction networks

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 7, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-15510-6

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Department of Biotechnology, Government of India [BT/MB/THSTI/HMC-SFC/2011]
  2. National Health and Education Society of P D Hinduja Hospital

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The gastric microbiome is suspected to have a role in the causation of diseases by Helicobacter pylori. Reports on their relative abundance vis-a-vis H. pylori are available from various ethnic and geographic groups, but little is known about their interaction patterns. Endoscopic mucosal biopsy samples from the gastric antrum and corpus of 39 patients with suspected H. pylori infection were collected and microbiomes were analyzed by 16S rDNA profiling. Four groups of samples were identified, which harbored Helicobacter as well as a diverse group of bacteria including Lactobacillus, Halomonas and Prevotella. There was a negative association between the microbiome diversity and Helicobacter abundance. Network analyses showed that Helicobacter had negative interactions with members of the gastric microbiome, while other microbes interacted positively with each other, showing a higher tendency towards intra-cluster co-occurrence/co-operation. Cross-geographic comparisons suggested the presence of region-specific microbial abundance profiles. We report the microbial diversity, abundance variation and interaction patterns of the gastric microbiota of Indian patients with H. pylori infection and present a comparison of the same with the gastric microbial ecology in samples from different geographic regions. Such microbial abundance profiles and microbial interactions can help in understanding the pathophysiology of gastric ailments and can thus help in development of new strategies to curb it.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available