4.5 Article

Effects of nanoparticle migration and asymmetric heating on magnetohydrodynamic forced convection of alumina/water nanofluid in microchannels

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MECHANICS B-FLUIDS
Volume 52, Issue -, Pages 169-184

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.euromechflu.2015.03.004

Keywords

Nanofluid; Microchannel; Nanoparticles migration; Magnetic field; Slip velocity; Modified Buongiomo's model

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The present paper is a theoretical investigation on effects of nanoparticle migration and asymmetric heating on forced convective heat transfer of alumina/water nanofluid in microchannels in presence of a uniform magnetic field. Walls are subjected to different heat fluxes; q(t) for top wall and q(b) for bottom wall, and because of non-adherence of the fluid solid interface due to the microscopic roughness in micro channels, Navier's slip boundary condition is considered at the surfaces. A two-component heterogeneous mixture model is used for nanofluid with the hypothesis that Brownian motion and thermophoretic diffusivities are the only significant slip mechanisms between solid and liquid phases. Assuming a fully developed flow and heat transfer, the basic partial differential equations including continuity, momentum, and energy equations have been reduced to two-point ordinary boundary value differential equations and solved numerically. It is revealed that nanoparticles eject themselves from heated walls, construct a depleted region, and accumulate in the core region, but more likely to accumulate near the wall with lower heat flux. Also, the non-uniform distribution of nanoparticles causes velocities to move toward the wall with a higher heat flux and enhances heat transfer rate there. In addition, inclusion of nanoparticles in a very strong magnetic field and slip velocity at the walls has a negative effect on performance. (C) 2015 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available