4.3 Article

Non-invasive detection of somatic mutations using nextgeneration sequencing in primary central nervous system lymphoma

Journal

ONCOTARGET
Volume 8, Issue 29, Pages 48157-48168

Publisher

IMPACT JOURNALS LLC
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.18325

Keywords

primary central nervous system lymphoma; circulating cell-free tumor DNA; somatic mutation; liquid biopsy; next-generation sequencing

Funding

  1. Institute of Research and Innovation in Biomedicine (IRIB, Rouen, France)
  2. french national cancer institute (INCA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: Primary central nervous system lymphomas (PCNSL) have recurrent genomic alterations. The main objective of our study was to demonstrate that targeted sequencing of circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) released by PCNSL at the time of diagnosis could identify somatic mutations by next-generation sequencing (NGS). Patients and Methods: PlasmacfDNA and matched tumor DNA (tDNA) from 25 PCNSL patients were sequenced using an Ion Torrent Personal Genome Machine (Life Technologies (R)). First, patient-specific targeted sequencing of identified somatic mutations in tDNA was performed. Then, a second sequencing targeting MYD88 c.T778C was performed and compared to plasma samples from 25 age-matched control patients suffering from other types of cancer. Results: According to the patient-specific targeted sequencing, eight patients (32% [95% CI 15-54%]) had detectable somatic mutations in cfDNA. Considering MYD88 sequencing, six patients had the specific c.T778C alteration detected in plasma. Using a control group, the sensitivity was 24% [9-45%] and the specificity was 100%. Tumor volume or deep brain structure involvement did not influence the detection of somatic mutations in plasma. Conclusion: This pilot study provided evidence that somatic mutations can be detected by NGS in the cfDNA of a subset of patients suffering from PCNSL.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available