4.3 Article

Clinical significance of CSF3R, SRSF2 and SETBP1 mutations in chronic neutrophilic leukemia and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia

Journal

ONCOTARGET
Volume 8, Issue 13, Pages 20834-20841

Publisher

IMPACT JOURNALS LLC
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.15355

Keywords

CNL; CMML; gene mutation; CSF3R; SRSF2

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81170490, 81400095]
  2. National Public Health Grand Research Foundation [201202017]
  3. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institute [JX10231801]
  4. Program for Development of Innovative Research Teams in the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University
  5. National Science & Technology Pillar Program [2014BAI09B12]
  6. Project of National Key Clinical Specialty

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chronic neutrophilic leukemia (CNL) and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) are rare hematologic neoplasms. We performed CSF3R, SRSF2 and SETBP1 mutational analyses in 10 CNL and 56 CMML patients. In this sample cohort, 80% of CNL patients harbored CSF3R mutations, of which the CSF3R T618I mutation was dominant. Mutations in CSF3R and SETBP1 were found in 7.1% and 5.3% CMML patients respectively, while 25% of CMML patients carried SRSF2 mutations. Strikingly, we identified that all of the CSF3R mutations detected in CMML patients were represented by a P733T mutation. The CSF3R P733T mutation represents a novel CSF3R mutation. In addition, none of the four CSF3R P733T mutated patients carried SRSF2 mutations [0/14 (0%) patients with combined CSF3R P733T and SRSF2 mutations vs. 4/42 (9.5%) with CSF3R P733T and wt SRSF2, P < 0.001]. Both mut SRSF2 and mut SETBP1 patients had shorter overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) compared to patients with wt SRSF2 (P < 0.001 both) and wt SETBP1 (P < 0.001 and P = 0.02, respectively). While we found no significant differences in OS and PFS as a consequence of CSF3R mutation status, our work suggest that the CSF3R T618I mutation is a diagnostic marker with good specificity and sensitivity for CNL. In conclusion, our study highlights effective diagnostic and prognostic markers of CNL and CMML patients in the Chinese population.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available