4.7 Article

Prevalence and Correlates of Metabolic Syndrome in Chinese Children: The China Health and Nutrition Survey

Journal

NUTRIENTS
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nu9010079

Keywords

children; metabolic syndrome; epidemiology; China

Funding

  1. National Institute of Nutrition and Food Safety, China Center for Disease Control and Prevention
  2. Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  3. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [R01-HD30880, DK056350, R01-HD38700]
  4. Fogarty International Center, NIH
  5. China-Japan Friendship Hospital
  6. Ministry of Health

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is generally defined as a cluster of metabolically related cardiovascular risk factors which are often associated with the condition of insulin resistance, elevated blood pressure, and abdominal obesity. During the past decades, MetS has become a major public health issue worldwide in both adults and children. In this study, data from the China Health and Nutrition Surveys (CHNS) was used to assess the prevalence of MetS based on both the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP-ATPIII) guidelines and the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) criteria, and to evaluate its possible correlates. A total of 831 children aged 7-18 years were included in this study, and 28 children were classified as having MetS as defined by the modified NCEP-ATPIII definition, which yielded an overall prevalence of 3.37%. Elevated blood pressure was the most frequent MetS component. The results of logistic regression models revealed that increased body mass index (BMI), hyperuricemia, and insulin resistance (IR) were all associated with the presence of MetS. To conclude, our study revealed the prevalence of MetS in Chinese children at the national level. Further large-scale studies are still needed to identify better MetS criteria in the general paediatric population in China.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available