4.7 Article

Is Skin Coloration Measured by Reflectance Spectroscopy Related to Intake of Nutrient-Dense Foods? A Cross-Sectional Evaluation in Australian Young Adults

Journal

NUTRIENTS
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nu10010011

Keywords

cross-sectional study; carotenoids; skin color; diet quality

Funding

  1. Hunter Medical Research Institute (HMRI)
  2. HMRI [14-30]
  3. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia Senior Research Fellowship
  4. University of Newcastle, Faculty of Health and Medicine Gladys M. Brawn Senior Research Fellowship
  5. University of Newcastle Gladys M Brawn Career Development Fellowship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The current study examines associations between the dietary intakes of nutrient-dense foods, measured using brief indices and skin coloration, measured using reflectance spectroscopy in young adults. This is a cross-sectional analysis of 148 young Australian males and females (55% female) aged 18 to 25 years. Dietary intake was assessed using a validated food frequency questionnaire, with responses used to calculate two dietary indices: (i) the Australian Recommended Food Score (ARFS); and (ii) the Fruit And Vegetable VAriety Score (FAVVA). Skin yellowness was measured at three body locations using reflectance spectroscopy. Associations were assessed using Spearman's correlation coefficients, regression analysis, and agreement using weighted kappa (K-w). Significant, moderate correlations were found between skin yellowness and diet index scores for the ARFS ( = 0.30, p < 0.001) and FAVVA score ( = 0.39, p < 0.001). These remained significant after adjustment for confounders (total fat intake, sex, skin lightness) and for agreement based on categorical rankings. Results suggest that measurement of skin coloration by reflectance spectroscopy can be used as an indicator of overall dietary quality and variety in young adults. Further exploration in diverse populations is required.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available