4.4 Review

Should Posttraumatic Stress Be a Disorder or a Specifier? Towards Improved Nosology Within the DSM Categorical Classification System

Journal

CURRENT PSYCHIATRY REPORTS
Volume 19, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11920-017-0821-7

Keywords

Trauma; PTSD; Stress disorder; DSM; Nosology; Classification

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose of Review Since 1980, posttraumatic stress (PTS) disorder has been controversial because of its origin as a social construct, its discriminating trauma definition, and the Procrustean array of symptoms/clusters chosen for inclusion/ exclusion. This review summarizes the history of traumarelated nosology and proposed changes, within current categorical models (trauma definitions, symptoms/clusters, subtypes/ specifiers, disorders) and new models. Recent Findings Considering that trauma is a risk factor for virtually all mental disorders (particularly depressive, anxiety, dissociative, personality), the multi-finality of trauma (some survivors are resilient, and some develop PTS and/or non-PTS symptoms), and the various symptoms that trauma survivors express (mood, cognitive, perceptual, somatic), it is difficult to classify PTS. Summary Because the human mind best comprehends categories, reliable classification generally necessitates using a categorical nosology but PTS defies categories (internalizing and/or externalizing, fear-based and/or numbing symptoms), the authors conclude that PTS-like DSM-5' s panic attacks specifier-is currently best conceptualized as a specifier for other mental disorders.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available