4.3 Article

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and alteration in semen quality and reproductive hormones

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Volume 27, Issue 9, Pages 1069-1073

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000408

Keywords

men; nonalcoholic fatty liver disease; reproductive hormones; semen quality

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [81200297, 81072362]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

ObjectivesNonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common cause of chronic liver disease in the world. Some reports have shown that NAFLD may cause multisystem damage, but its influence on male reproductive function has rarely been studied.AimTo evaluate the influence of NAFLD on sperm quality and reproductive hormones in Chinese men.Materials and methodsA total of 102 NAFLD men and 94 healthy men without fatty liver (control) were enrolled in this study. All participants underwent a physical examination, and were subjected to lifestyle questionnaires and abdominal ultrasound examination. The semen quality (volume, concentration, motility, and morphology) and serum hormonal levels (testosterone, estradiol, follicle-stimulating hormone, inhibin B, sex hormone-binding globulin, and luteinizing hormone) were examined and compared between the two groups.ResultsThe levels of serum testosterone and sex hormone-binding globulin were significantly lower in the NAFLD patients compared with the control group. Sperm concentration (P=0.04), sperm count (P=0.01), and total motility (P=0.03) in the NAFLD patients were significantly decreased compared with the control group. However, no significant differences were observed in semen volume and morphology. Multivariate analysis showed that sperm concentration, sperm count, and motility were significantly associated with NAFLD and abstinence (P<0.05 or P<0.001).ConclusionThese results suggest that NAFLD could significantly affect sperm quality and reproductive hormones.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available