4.0 Article

A Standard Set of Outcome Measures for the Comprehensive Appraisal of Cleft Care

Journal

CLEFT PALATE CRANIOFACIAL JOURNAL
Volume 54, Issue 5, Pages 540-554

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1597/15-292

Keywords

cleft lip; cleft palate; continuous quality improvement; learning health care; outcomes; patient-reported outcomes; value-based health care

Funding

  1. Plastic Surgical Foundation Pilot Research Grant [273938]
  2. 69th Annual Meeting of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association (ACPA) in San Jose, California
  3. 12th International Congress in Orlando, Florida
  4. 71st Annual Meeting of the ACPA in Indianapolis, Indiana
  5. Boston Children's Hospital
  6. Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
  7. Texas Children's Hospital
  8. Great Ormond Street Hospital

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Care of the patient with cleft lip and/or palate remains complex. Prior attempts at aggregating data to study the effectiveness of specific interventions or overall treatment protocols have been hindered by a lack of data standards. There exists a critical need to better define the outcomes-particularly those that matter most to patients and their families- and to standardize the methods by which these outcomes will be measured. This report summarizes the recommendations of an international, multidisciplinary working group with regard to which outcomes a typical cleft team could track, how those outcomes could be measured and recorded, and what strategies may be employed to sustainably implement a system for prospective data collection. It is only by agreeing on a common, standard set of outcome measures for the comprehensive appraisal of cleft care that intercenter comparisons can become possible. This is important for quality-improvement endeavors, comparative effectiveness research, and value-based health-care reform.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available