4.2 Article

Throughput-Optimized FPGA Accelerator for Deep Convolutional Neural Networks

Publisher

ASSOC COMPUTING MACHINERY
DOI: 10.1145/3079758

Keywords

Design; Experimentation; Performance; FPGA architecture; convolutional neural networks; optimisation; high performance computing; application mapping

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation of China [U1435219, 61303070, 61402507, 61402499]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have gained great success in various computer vision applications. State-of-the-art CNN models for large-scale applications are computation intensive and memory expensive and, hence, are mainly processed on high-performance processors like server CPUs and GPUs. However, there is an increasing demand of high-accuracy or real-time object detection tasks in large-scale clusters or embedded systems, which requires energy-efficient accelerators because of the green computation requirement or the limited battery restriction. Due to the advantages of energy efficiency and reconfigurability, Field-Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs) have been widely explored as CNN accelerators. In this article, we present an in-depth analysis of computation complexity and the memory footprint of each CNN layer type. Then a scalable parallel framework is proposed that exploits four levels of parallelism in hardware acceleration. We further put forward a systematic design space exploration methodology to search for the optimal solution that maximizes accelerator throughput under the FPGA constraints such as on-chip memory, computational resources, external memory bandwidth, and clock frequency. Finally, we demonstrate the methodology by optimizing three representative CNNs (LeNet, AlexNet, and VGG-S) on a Xilinx VC709 board. The average performance of the three accelerators is 424.7, 445.6, and 473.4GOP/s under 100MHz working frequency, which outperforms the CPU and previous work significantly.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available