4.4 Article

Atmospheric particulate matter2.5 promotes the migration and invasion of hepatocellular carcinoma cells

Journal

ONCOLOGY LETTERS
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages 3445-3450

Publisher

SPANDIDOS PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.3892/ol.2017.5947

Keywords

particulate matter(2.5); migration; invasion; hepatocellular carcinoma cells; ART

Categories

Funding

  1. Provisions of Shanghai Municipality on Science and Technology Awards from Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Commission [2013sy036]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Epidemiological data has demonstrated that particulate matter (PM) with an aerodynamic diameter <= 2.5 mu m (PM2.5) is associated with cancer incidence. However, the precise mechanisms underlying PM2.5-mediated hepatocellular carcinoma cancer (HCC) migration and invasion remain unclear. The aim of the present study was to explore the response of the HCC cell lines HepG2 and HuH-7 to PM2.5 exposure. The results revealed that PM2.5 treatment promoted the migration and invasion of HCC cells, in addition to increasing protein levels of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-13. Additionally, PM2.5 induced intracellular reactive oxygen species formation in HCC cells. Further investigation revealed that phosphorylation of RAC-alpha serine/threonine-protein kinase (AKT) increased in response to PM2.5 exposure in HCC cells, and the AKT antagonist LY294002 reduced PM2.5-induced migration, invasion and MMP-13 expression. In addition, the data from the present study demonstrated that high concentrations of PM2.5 decreased the proliferation of normal HL7702 hepatocyte cells and promoted apoptosis. These results indicate that the activation of AKT by PM2.5 results in MMP-13 overexpression, and stimulates HCC cell migration and invasion. In conclusion, the results from the present study demonstrate that PM2.5 promotes HCC development and elucidate a potential underlying molecular mechanism for this effect.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available