4.3 Review

The best models of metabolism

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/wsbm.1391

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NSF [MCB-0958172, MCB-0946595, MCB-1517588, MCB 1411672, DEB-1241046]
  2. NIH [1P30ES019776-01A1]
  3. DOE-BESC [DE-AC0500OR22725]
  4. Office of Biological and Environmental Research in DOE Office of Science
  5. Federal funds from US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services [HHSN272201200031C]
  6. Division Of Environmental Biology
  7. Direct For Biological Sciences [1241046] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  8. Div Of Molecular and Cellular Bioscience
  9. Direct For Biological Sciences [1517588] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Biochemical systems are among of the oldest application areas of mathematical modeling. Spanning a time period of over one hundred years, the repertoire of options for structuring a model and for formulating reactions has been constantly growing, and yet, it is still unclear whether or to what degree some models are better than others and how the modeler is to choose among them. In fact, the variety of options has become overwhelming and difficult to maneuver for novices and experts alike. This review outlines the metabolic model design process and discusses the numerous choices for modeling frameworks and mathematical representations. It tries to be inclusive, even though it cannot be complete, and introduces the various modeling options in a manner that is as unbiased as that is feasible. However, the review does end with personal recommendations for the choices of default models. (C) 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available