4.5 Article

Hepatic artery-infusion chemotherapy improved survival of hepatocellular carcinoma after radical hepatectomy

Journal

ONCOTARGETS AND THERAPY
Volume 10, Issue -, Pages 3001-3005

Publisher

DOVE MEDICAL PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.2147/OTT.S136806

Keywords

hepatocellular carcinoma; hepatic artery-infusion chemotherapy; intrahepatic recurrence; metastasis

Funding

  1. Foundation of Huzhou Bureau of Science and Technology [2016YZB02]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To evaluate the effect of postoperative hepatic artery-infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) on survival probability in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after radical hepatectomy. Patients and methods: This retrospective study included 85 patients with HCC who received radical hepatectomy from May 2005 to May 2010. Among these patients, 42 underwent two sessions of HAIC (5-fluoruracil [1,000 mg/m(2)], oxaliplatin [85 mg/m(2)], and mitomycin-C [6 mg/m(2)]) after radical hepatectomy (HAIC group), and 43 underwent radical hepatectomy only (the control group). HAIC-related side effects and long-term survival were retrospectively analyzed. Results: The HAIC group showed a significantly higher 5-year intrahepatic recurrence-free survival probability and lower risk of intrahepatic recurrence (HR 0.5615, 95% CI 0.3234-0.9749 [log-rank test]; P=0.0332). The HAIC group also had significantly higher 5-year disease-free survival probability (HR 0.591, 95% CI 0.3613-0.9666 [log-rank test]; P=0.0298) and overall survival probability than the control group (HR 0.5768, 95% CI 0.3469-0.9589 [log-rank test]; P=0.0278). No HAIC-related deaths in the HAIC group were reported. All toxicities and complications were controlled, and no patients quit the treatment. Conclusion: HAIC can effectively and safely reduce intrahepatic recurrence and improve the long-term survival of patients with HCC after radical hepatectomy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available