4.1 Article

Safety and efficacy of NEPA, an oral fixed combination of netupitant and palonosetron, in older patients

Journal

JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC ONCOLOGY
Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages 56-63

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2016.09.002

Keywords

Neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist; Netupitant; 5-Hydroxytryptamine receptor antagonist; Palonosetron; NEPA; CINV; Multiple chemotherapy cycles; Older patients; Moderately emetogenic chemotherapy; Highly emetogenic chemotherapy

Funding

  1. Helsinn Healthcare SA, Lugano, Switzerland
  2. Helsinn

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: Prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting is critical in older patients with cancer. NEPA is an oral fixed combination of netupitant 300 mg, a new NK1 receptor antagonist (RA), and palonosetron 0.5 mg, a pharmacologically distinct 5-HT3 RA. This retrospective analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of NEPA in older patients. Methods: Patients aged >= 65 and >= 70 years from one phase II and two phase III trials were considered. Chemotherapy-naive patients with malignant tumors were treated with anthracycline-cyclophosphamide (AC),non-AC-based moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (non-AC MEC), or highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC). Following single-dose NEPA, patients received oral dexamethasone on day 1 (AC and non-AC MEC) or days 1-4 (HEC). Efficacy was evaluated through complete response (CR) in cycle 1. Safety was evaluated by AEs and ECGs. Data were summarized by descriptive statistics. Results: Overall, 214 patients were >= 65 years and 80 were >= 70 years. A higher CR was observed in older patients versus the total population; in the acute phase >90% of patients >= 65 years experienced CR. Efficacy was maintained over multiple cycles of chemotherapy. No significant nausea rates were generally higher in the older patients versus total population. Similar rates of AEs in the first treatment cycle were reported for patients >= 65 years, >= 70 years, and total population (72.9% vs 67.5% vs 70.0%, respectively). No cardiac safety concerns were raised. Conclusion: NEPA is highly effective in older patients receiving MEC or HEC regimens. NEPA is also well tolerated, demonstrating suitability for use in older patients who may have comorbidities. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available