4.5 Article

Treatment Outcomes and Prognostic Factors After Recurrence of Esophageal Squamous Cell carcinoma

Journal

WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY
Volume 42, Issue 7, Pages 2190-2198

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00268-017-4430-8

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15K10101] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The evaluation of treatment outcomes and detection of prognostic factors after recurrence are very important for tailoring optimal therapies for individual patients with recurrent esophageal cancer. We reviewed 133 patients in whom esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) recurred after curative surgery, and assessed recurrence patterns, treatment outcomes and prognostic factors. Recurrence in 57 (42.9%), 54 (40.6%) and 22 (16.5%) patients was locoregional, distant and combined, respectively. The median amounts of elapsed time until recurrence and median survival after recurrence for all patients were 9.1 and 8.3 months, respectively. Univariate and multivariate analyses selected time to recurrence (hazard ratio [HR], 0.98; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.97-0.999; p = 0.04), recurrence location (locoregional vs. distant: HR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.03-2.61; p = 0.04), number of organs with recurrence (1 vs. 3: HR, 3.49; 95% CI, 1.23-9.87; p = 0.02) and treatment after recurrence (best supportive care, [BSC] vs. chemotherapy [CT] or radiation therapy [RT]: HR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.15-0.94; p = 0.04; BSC vs. CT and RT: HR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.26-0.94; p = 0.03; BSC vs. surgery: HR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.25-0.88; p = 0.02) as independent factors for survival after recurrence. Seventeen (12.8%) patients who had localized lymph node recurrence and lung oligometastasis and received multidisciplinary therapy after recurrence survived for > 3 years thereafter. Despite the poor survival of patients with ESCC and early or distant recurrence or recurrence in recurrent organs, appropriate multimodal therapies should be tailored for individual patients with recurrent ESCC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available