4.7 Article

Solid anaerobic digestion batch with liquid digestate recirculation and wet anaerobic digestion of organic waste: Comparison of system performances and identification of microbial guilds

Journal

WASTE MANAGEMENT
Volume 59, Issue -, Pages 172-180

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2016.10.039

Keywords

High throughput sequencing; Liquid digestate recirculation; Methane; Microbial population; Organic waste; Solid anaerobic digestion batch; Wet anaerobic digestion

Funding

  1. Department of Engineering of the University of Perugia, Italy [D.D. 20/2015]
  2. Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Perugia, Perugia, Italy [2015.0297.021]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Solid anaerobic digestion batch (SADB) with liquid digestate recirculation and wet anaerobic digestion of organic waste were experimentally investigated. SADB was operated at an organic loading rate (OLR) of 4.55 kgVS/m(3) day, generating about 252 NL CH4/kgVS, whereas the wet digester was operated at an OLR of 0.9 kgVS/m(3) day, generating about 320 NL CH4/kgVS. The initial total volatile fatty acids concentrations for SADB and wet digestion were about 12,500 mg/L and 4500 mg/L, respectively. There were higher concentrations of ammonium and COD for the SADB compared to the wet one. The genomic analysis performed by high throughput sequencing returned a number of sequences for each sample ranging from 110,619 to 373,307. More than 93% were assigned to the Bacteria domain. Seven and nine major phyla were sequenced for the SADB and wet digestion, respectively, with Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes and Proteobacteria being the dominant phyla in both digesters. Taxonomic profiles suggested a methanogenic pathway characterized by a relevant syntrophic acetate-oxidizing metabolism mainly in the liquid digestate of the SADB. This result also confirms the benefits of liquid digestate recirculation for improving the efficiency of AD performed with high solids (>30%w/w) content. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available