4.5 Article

An automated, multiplex-tandem PCR platform for the diagnosis of gastrointestinal nematode infections in cattle: An Australian-European validation study

Journal

VETERINARY PARASITOLOGY
Volume 239, Issue -, Pages 62-75

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2017.04.011

Keywords

Ruminants; Cattle; Trichostrongylid nematodes; Larval culture; Diagnosis; PCR; Epidemiology

Funding

  1. Merial Animal Health
  2. Scottish Government's Rural and Environment Science and Analytical Services (RESAS)
  3. Moredun Research Institute
  4. Australian Research Council Discovery Early Career Researcher Award

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Detecting the genera and species of gastrointestinal (GI) nematode infections in faecal samples obtained from cattle requires the incubation of faeces ('larval culture') followed by identification of the third-stage larvae that are harvested after 10-14 days. Substantial research in the development of PCR-based methods for the rapid and specific identification GI nematodes has been conducted for small ruminants, whilst only few such assays have been developed for cattle. In the present paper we describe the development of an automated, robotic PCR platform for the detection and genus and/or species-specific identification of GI nematodes from bovine faecal samples. This test was then validated using samples from different regions of three countries (Australia, Belgium and Scotland). The PCR platform was found to be highly sensitive and specific for the identification of the important GI nematodes in naturally infected cattle (both estimates > 90%). The PCR platform can also estimate the percentage of genera or species present in a mixed-species infection, and was found superior to larval culture in terms of speed (1-2 days versus 1-2 weeks for culture), sensitivity and specificity. The PCR was simple to use and the operator requires no knowledge or experience to identify the nematodes present, compared to larval culture where even experienced operators can make substantial errors due to considerable overlap in the published characteristics of key species.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available