4.7 Article

Synergetic effects of ultrasound and slightly acidic electrolyzed water against Staphylococcus aureus evaluated by flow cytometry and electron microscopy

Journal

ULTRASONICS SONOCHEMISTRY
Volume 38, Issue -, Pages 711-719

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2016.08.029

Keywords

Synergetic effects; Ultrasound; Slightly acidic electrolyzed water; Staphylococcus aureus; Flow cytometry; Electron microscopy

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31401608, 31371872]
  2. National Major R & D Program of China [2016YFD0400301]
  3. SRF for ROCS, SEM

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated the synergetic effects of ultrasound and slightly acidic electrolyzed water (SAEW) on the inactivation of Staphylococcus aureus using flow cytometry and electron microscopy. The individual ultrasound treatment for 10 min only resulted in 0.36 log CM/mL reductions of S. aureus, while the SAEW treatment alone for 10 min resulted in 3.06 log CFU/mL reductions. The log reductions caused by combined treatment were enhanced to 3.68 log CFU/mL, which were greater than the sum of individual treatments. This phenomenon was referred to as synergistic effects. FCM analysis distinguished live and dead cells as well as revealed dynamic changes in the physiological states of S. aureus after different treatments. The combined treatment greatly reduced the number of viable but nonculturable (VBNC) bacteria to 0.07%; in contrast, a single ultrasound treatment for 10 min induced the formation of VBNC cells to 45.75%. Scanning and transmission electron microscopy analysis revealed that greater damage to the appearance and ultrastructure of S. aureus were achieved after combined ultrasound-SAEW treatment compared to either treatment alone. These results indicated that combining ultrasound with SAEW is a promising sterilization technology with potential uses for environmental remediation and food preservation. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available