4.7 Article

Electrically-assisted bikes: Potential impacts on travel behaviour

Journal

TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE
Volume 103, Issue -, Pages 327-342

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2017.03.007

Keywords

Pedelec; Electrically-assisted bicycle; Cycling; e-Bike; Electric mobility; Sustainable transport

Funding

  1. UK Research Councils Digital Economy and Energy Programmes/EPSRC [EP/J004855/1]
  2. Raleigh
  3. Bupa International
  4. Brighton & Hove City Council
  5. Baker Street Bikes
  6. M's Cycles
  7. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/J004855/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. EPSRC [EP/J004855/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper reports on a review of the European literature about the impacts of having an electrically-assisted bike available to use, together with results from a trial in the UK city of Brighton, where 80 employees were loaned an electrically-assisted bike for a 6-8 week period. In the Brighton trial, three-quarters of those who were loaned an e-bike used them at least once a week. Across the sample as a whole, average usage was in the order of 1520 miles per week, and was accompanied by an overall reduction in car mileage of 20%. At the end of the trial, 38% participants expected to cycle more in the future, and at least 70% said that they would like to have an e-bike available for use in the future, and would cycle more if this was the case. This is consistent with the results of the European literature which shows that when e-bikes are made available, they get used; that a proportion of e-bike trips typically substitutes for car use; and that many people who take part in trials become interested in future e-bike use, or cycling more generally. (c) 2017 TRL Limited, University of Brighton and other collaborating authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available