4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Temporal variation of green macroalgal assemblage on Porphyra aquaculture rafts in the Subei Shoal, China

Journal

ESTUARINE COASTAL AND SHELF SCIENCE
Volume 163, Issue -, Pages 23-28

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecss.2015.03.016

Keywords

Yellow Sea; Subei Shoal; green tides; green macroalgal assemblage; Porphyra aquaculture

Funding

  1. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2010CB428703]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for FIO [2011G20]
  3. NSFC-Shandong Joint Funded Project Marine Ecology and Environmental Sciences [U1406403]
  4. International Science and Technology Cooperation Program of China [2010DFA24340]
  5. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41306171]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Previous studies showed that Ulva prolifera caused green tides in the Yellow Sea were very possible from the facilities of Porphyra aquaculture. To confirm the origin of green algae, the assemblage of fouling macroalgae growing on rafts were investigated from early March to the middle of May across the growing season. The results showed that the fouling green macroalgae increased rapidly and reached to the maximum in biomass during mid-May. Six species, including Blidingia sp., U. prolifera, Ulva linza, Ulva compressa, Ulva intestinalis and Ulva clathrata were identified from the rafts. In early March, the dominant species were U. compressa, U. intestinalis and U. clathrata; while they shifted to Blidingia sp. and U. prolifera in late March to middle May. This study indicated that the changes in sea temperature might affect the nutrient uptake rate of the green macroalgae, and then affect the temporal variation in the raftfouling green macroalgae. The biomass of U. prolifera was sufficient to seed a massive green tides, based on its high growth rate. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available