4.6 Article

Dalteparin thromboprophylaxis in cancer patients at high risk for venous thromboembolism: A randomized trial

Journal

THROMBOSIS RESEARCH
Volume 151, Issue -, Pages 89-95

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2017.01.009

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [R01HL95109]
  2. National Cancer Institute [K23 CA120587]
  3. Sondra and Stephen Hardis Chair in Oncology Research
  4. Scott Hamilton CARES Initiative

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Ambulatory cancer patients at high-risk for venous thromboembolism(VTE) can be identified using a validated risk score (Khorana score). We evaluated the benefit of outpatient thromboprophylaxis with dalteparin in high-risk patients in a multicenter randomized study. Methods: Cancer patients with Khorana score >= 3 starting a new systemic regimen were screened for VTE and if negative randomized to dalteparin 5000 units daily or observation for 12 weeks. Subjects were screened with lower extremity ultrasounds every 4 weeks on study and with chest CT at 12 weeks. The primary efficacy end-point was all VTE over 12 weeks and primary safety endpoint was clinically relevant bleeding events over 13 weeks. The study was terminated early due to low accrual. Results: Of 117 enrolled patients, 10 (8.5%) had VTE on baseline screening and were not randomized. Of 98 randomized patients, VTE occurred in 12% (N = 6/50) of patients on dalteparin and 21% (N = 10/48) on observation (hazard ratio, HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.23-1.89). Major bleeding was similar (N = 1) in each arm but clinically relevant bleeding was higher in dalteparin arm(N = 7 versus 1 on observation) (HR = 7.0, 95% CI 1.2-131.6). There was no difference in overall survival. Conclusions: Thromboprophylaxis is associated with a non-significantly reduced risk of VTE and significantly increased risk of clinically relevant bleeding in this underpowered study. The Khorana score successfully identifies patients with high incidence of VTE both at baseline and during treatment. Future studies should continue to focus on risk-adapted approaches to reduce the burden of VTE in cancer. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available