4.5 Article

Thermal degradation and flame retardant properties of isocyanate-based flexible polyimide foams with different isocyanate indices

Journal

THERMOCHIMICA ACTA
Volume 652, Issue -, Pages 160-165

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.tca.2017.03.019

Keywords

Polyimide; Isocyanate index; Flexible foams; Thermal stability; Flame resistance

Funding

  1. Beijing Top Young Innovative Talents Program [2014000026833ZK13]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51373004]
  3. Key Laboratory for Solid Waste Management and Environment Safety (Tsinghua University), Ministry of Education of China [SWMES 2015-02]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A series of isocyanate-based flexible polyimide foams were prepared with different isocyanate indices. The structure and.properties of these polyimide foams were characterized in detail. The results indicated that with the increase of isocyanate index, the density decreased from 8.7 kg/m(3) to 5.7 kg/m(3). The open cell ratio was in the range of 94.9%-96.4% and less influenced by the content of isocyanate. The compression strength increased first with the increase of isocyanate index, and reached the maximum value at an isocyanate index of 1.04. All the polyimide foams possessed excellent thermal stability, with temperature at weight loss of 5% and 10% being in the range of 288.5-320.0 degrees C and 337.7-369.0 degrees C, respectively. The limiting oxygen index (LOI) values for all the samples were above 25%, indicating the high flame resistance character of polyimide. The heat release peak values, the total heat release and mean heat release rate exhibited similar trends of little changes with isocyanate index varying from 0.89 to 1.04 and increasing rapidly with the index more than 1.11, indicating the side products of amino or uramido produced by excess isocyanate would damage the flame resistance properties of polyimide foams severely.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available