4.5 Article

New alternatives for reference evapotranspiration estimation in West Africa using limited weather data and ancillary data supply strategies.

Journal

THEORETICAL AND APPLIED CLIMATOLOGY
Volume 132, Issue 3-4, Pages 701-716

Publisher

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00704-017-2120-y

Keywords

Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs); Gene Expression Programing (GEPs); Ancillary/external approaches; Evapotranspiration; West Africa

Funding

  1. European Union

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Accurate estimation of reference evapotranspiration (ET (0) ) is essential for the computation of crop water requirements, irrigation scheduling, and water resources management. In this context, having a battery of alternative local calibrated ET (0) estimation methods is of great interest for any irrigation advisory service. The development of irrigation advisory services will be a major breakthrough for West African agriculture. In the case of many West African countries, the high number of meteorological inputs required by the Penman-Monteith equation has been indicated as constraining. The present paper investigates for the first time in Ghana, the estimation ability of artificial intelligence-based models (Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) and Gene Expression Programing (GEPs)), and ancillary/external approaches for modeling reference evapotranspiration (ET (0) ) using limited weather data. According to the results of this study, GEPs have emerged as a very interesting alternative for ET (0) estimation at all the locations of Ghana which have been evaluated in this study under different scenarios of meteorological data availability. The adoption of ancillary/external approaches has been also successful, moreover in the southern locations. The interesting results obtained in this study using GEPs and some ancillary approaches could be a reference for future studies about ET (0) estimation in West Africa.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available