4.2 Article

Integrative taxonomic revision of Campylocia (mayflies: Ephemeroptera, Euthyplociidae)

Journal

SYSTEMATICS AND BIODIVERSITY
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages 564-581

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14772000.2017.1291543

Keywords

cryptic species; identification key; K2P distances; new species; new synonym; redescription of species; scanning electron microscopy

Funding

  1. Fundacao Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro [E26-111.389/2010]
  2. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior [99999.014008/2013-00]
  3. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico [140255/2011-7, 481.554/2012-2]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A morphological comparison of type and non-type material of species of Campylocia, including their junior synonyms, was conducted, in addition to neighbour joining based on K2P distances and Bayesian inference analyses of 376 bp of the mitochondrial gene cytochrome oxidase I (COI) of recently collected specimens. Results revealed the lack of distinguishing characters between C. bocainensis and C. dochmia supported by the molecular analysis, where the overlap of intra- and interspecific genetic divergences suggested genetic flow among individuals. Campylocia burmeisteri is revalidated as a senior synonym of Brazilian south-eastern species C. bocainensis and C. dochmia and of E. guntheri, formerly a synonym of C. anceps. Campylocia burmeisteri is redescribed based on material from its type-locality, Nova Friburgo, Rio de Janeiro State. Two new species, C. demoulini sp. nov. and C. araca sp. nov., are described from the Amazon rain forest and a third species, C. orosi sp. nov., is described from Costa Rica. Possible cryptic species and the utility of egg morphology in the taxonomy of Campylocia are discussed for the first time for the genus. A key to the identification of adult stages of Campylocia is provided based on male genitalia and egg morphology

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available