4.3 Article

Diamond-bearing ophiolites and their geological occurrence

Journal

EPISODES
Volume 38, Issue 4, Pages 344-364

Publisher

GEOLOGICAL SOC KOREA
DOI: 10.18814/epiiugs/2015/v38i4/82430

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NSF-China
  2. CGS
  3. Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We document in this study the geological occurrence of diamonds and other ultrahigh-pressure (UHF) minerals in ophiolitic mantle peridotites and podiform chromitites from different orogenic belts. These minerals exist in both high-Cr and high-Al chromitites. Most ophiolite-hosted diamonds are small (similar to 200-500 mu m across), and some contain distinctive inclusions (i.e., coesite, Ni-Mn-Co alloys, spessartite, tephroite). All of the analyzed diamonds have extremely light carbon isotope compositions (delta C-13 = -28.7 to -18.3 parts per thousand) and variable trace element contents that distinguish them from most kimberlitic and UHF metamorphic varieties. A wide range of highly reduced minerals, such as native elements, Ni-Mn-Co alloys, Fe-Si and Fe-C phases and moissanite (SiC) also occuras accompanying mineral separates confirming the super-reducing conditions of their environment of formation. The presence of exsolution lamellae of diopside and coesite in some chromite grains suggests chromite crystallization depths around >380 km, near the mantle transition zone. Carbon and other recycled crustal materials at these depths are likely to have been derived from previously subducted material. The peridotites encapsulating the podiform chromitites and diamonds were transported to shallow mantle by convection cells beneath oceanic spreading centers. The chromitites may have formed in the deep mantle or in shallow suprasubduction zone environments. Our observations suggest that diamonds, UHF minerals and recycled crustal material are likely to be ubiquitous in the oceanic mantle.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available