4.2 Article

Antibacterial and physicochemical properties of co-sputtered CuSn thin films

Journal

SURFACE AND INTERFACE ANALYSIS
Volume 50, Issue 2, Pages 138-145

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/sia.6349

Keywords

CuSn thin films; antibacterial effect; XPS; RF sputtering

Funding

  1. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea
  2. Ministry of Education [2016R1A2B4013157]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2016R1A2B4013157] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Copper-tin thin films (CT TFs) were deposited on p-type Si(100) by radio frequency (RF) magnetron co-sputtering method. The atomic ratio of Cu and Sn showed complementary tendency with various RF powers on metal targets. Antibacterial test was conducted with Gram-negative Escherichia coli. The ratio of Cu and Sn ions and the contact time with E.coli affected the antibacterial efficiency. Increasing the ratio of Cu ions and contact time showed higher antibacterial activity. Cu20Sn6 called as bronze structure, metallic Cu, and copper oxide phases were identified from X-ray diffraction data after sterilization. The lattice strain that was changed due to the substitution of Cu and Sn was also calculated. The surface morphology of CT TFs was entirely grown to round shape when the dominant element was Sn. But, as the content of Cu increased, the surface morphology was changed from ball shape to sharp column shape. When fixed contact time, the intensities of Cu 2p increased but the intensities of Sn 3d decreased as increasing the atomic ratio of Cu. The oxidation of Cu was more sharply progressed as the RF power on Cu target increased. When fixed CT TFs, the intensities of Cu 2p were consistent but the intensities of Sn 3d(3/2) decreased as increasing contact time between CT TF and E.coli.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available