4.4 Article

Perampanel in patients with refractory and super-refractory status epilepticus in a neurological intensive care unit

Journal

EPILEPSY & BEHAVIOR
Volume 49, Issue -, Pages 354-358

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2015.04.005

Keywords

Refractory status epilepticus; Noncompetitive AMPA receptor antagonist; Glutamate; Piampanel; Seizure

Funding

  1. Neuroconsult
  2. GSK
  3. biogen-idec
  4. Novartis
  5. Red Bull
  6. UCB

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: In refractory status epilepticus (SE), because of subcellular maladaptive changes, GABAergic drugs are no longer effective, and the excitatory neurotransmitter glutamate (Glu) plays a major role in seizure perpetuation. Perampanel (PER, licensed since 09/2012) is the first orally active noncompetitive AMPA receptor antagonist for adjunctive treatment of refractory focal epilepsy. Methods: We analyzed treatment response, seizure outcome, and adverse effects of add-on treatment with perampanel in patients with refractory status epilepticus in the Neurological Intensive Care Unit (NICU), Salzburg, Austria between 09/2012 and 11 2014 by retrospective chart review. Results: Twelve patients (75% women) with refractory status epileptic-us were treated with PER administered per nasogastric tube between 09/2012 and 11/2014. Median age was 75 years [range: 60-91]. The most frequent SE type was nonconvulsive SE (NCSE) with (5/12, 42%) and without coma (6/12, 50%). In seven patients (58%), SE arose de nova, with an acute symptomatic cause in five patients (42%). Cerebrovascular diseases (4/12, 33%) and cerebral tumors (4/12, 33%) were the most common etiologies. Perampanel was given after a median number of four antiepileptic drugs [range: 2-7] and a median time of 1.5 days [range: 0.8-18.31. In one patient (8%), clinical improvement was observed within 24 h and EEG improvement within 60 h after administration of PER, while in another patient (8%), clinical and EEG improvement was observed more than 48 h after administration. Median initial dose was 4 mg [range: 2-12; SD: 4.111, titrated up to a median of 12 mg [range: 4-121 in steps of 2 to 4 mg per day. No adverse effects were reported regarding carcliorespiratory changes or laboratory parameters. Outcomes after SE were moderate disability in five patients (42%), death in three patients (25%), and persistent vegetative state in two patients (17%). Conclusion: Though glutamate plays a major role in seizure perpetuation, the noncompetitive AMPA receptor antagonist PER could only ameliorate seizure activity in a few patients with refractory SE. The long duration of SE before the administration of PER via nasogastric tube, as well as relatively low closes of PER, might be responsible for the modest result. Perampanel was well tolerated, and no adverse events were reported. 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (littp://creativecommons.Orgilicenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available