4.7 Article

When is the observational method in geotechnical engineering favourable?

Journal

STRUCTURAL SAFETY
Volume 66, Issue -, Pages 17-26

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.strusafe.2017.01.006

Keywords

Observational method; Reliability-based design; Decision analysis; Eurocode 7

Funding

  1. Swedish Hydropower Centre (SVC)
  2. Rock Engineering Research Foundation (BeFo)
  3. Swedish Research Council Formas

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The observational method in geotechnical engineering is an acceptable verification method for limit states in Eurocode 7, but the method is rarely used despite its potential savings. Some reasons may be its unclear safety definition and the lack of guidelines on how to establish whether the observational method is more favourable than conventional design. In this paper, we challenge these issues by introducing a reliability constraint on the observational method and propose a probabilistic optimization methodology that aids the decision-making engineer in choosing between the observational method and conventional design. The methodology suggests an optimal design after comparing the expected utilities of the considered design options. The methodology is illustrated with a practical example, in which a geotechnical engineer evaluates whether the observational method may be favourable in the design of a rock pillar. We conclude that the methodology may prove to be a valuable tool for decision-making engineers' everyday work with managing risks in geotechnical projects. (C) 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available