4.5 Article

The effect of temperature on different Salmonella serotypes during warm seasons in a Mediterranean climate city, Adelaide, Australia

Journal

EPIDEMIOLOGY AND INFECTION
Volume 144, Issue 6, Pages 1231-1240

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0950268815002587

Keywords

Climate - impact of; foodborne infections; infectious disease epidemiology; Salmonella; Salmonella typing

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Changing trends in foodborne disease are influenced by many factors, including temperature. Globally and in Australia, warmer ambient temperatures are projected to rise if climate change continues. Salmonella spp. are a temperature-sensitive pathogen and rising temperature can have a substantial effect on disease burden affecting human health. We examined the relationship between temperature and Salmonella spp. and serotype notifications in Adelaide, Australia. Time-series Poisson regression models were fit to estimate the effect of temperature during warmer months on Salmonella spp. and serotype cases notified from 1990 to 2012. Long-term trends, seasonality, autocorrelation and lagged effects were included in the statistical models. Daily Salmonella spp. counts increased by 13% [incidence rate ratio (IRR) 1013, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1008-1019] per 1 degrees C rise in temperature in the warm season with greater increases observed in specific serotype and phage-type cases ranging from 34% (IRR 1034, 95% CI 1008-1061) to 44% (IRR 1044, 95% CI 1024-1064). We observed increased cases of S. Typhimurium PT9 and S. Typhimurium PT108 notifications above a threshold of 39 degrees C. This study has identified the impact of warm season temperature on different Salmonella spp. strains and confirms higher temperature has a greater effect on phage-type notifications. The findings will contribute targeted information for public health policy interventions, including food safety programmes during warmer weather.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available