Journal
EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 26, Issue 3, Pages 436-440Publisher
LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000268
Keywords
-
Categories
Funding
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research [MAH-114445]
- Chair in maternal, fetal, and infant health services research from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research [APR-126338]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Background: We carried out a study to examine whether left truncation bias could explain the negative association between smoking and preeclampsia. Methods: Monte Carlo and other simulation models were used to determine the effect of differential rates of early pregnancy loss among smokers on the relation between smoking and preeclampsia at >= 20 weeks' gestation. Assumptions included no association between smoking and the abnormal placentation that characterizes preeclampsia, and higher rates of early pregnancy loss among smokers, pregnancies with abnormal placentation, and smokers with abnormal placentation. Results: Monte Carlo simulation yielded a rate ratio for preeclampsia, given smoking of 0.85 (95% confidence interval = 0.73, 0.98). The protective effect of smoking was also evident in simulations that did not require assumptions about early pregnancy loss rates. Conclusion: Left truncation bias due to differential rates of early pregnancy loss among smokers is a plausible explanation for the inverse association between maternal smoking and preeclampsia.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available