4.5 Article

THE EFFECT OF CuO NPS ON REACTIVE OXYGEN SPECIES AND CELL CYCLE GENE EXPRESSION IN ROOTS OF RICE

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY
Volume 34, Issue 3, Pages 554-561

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/etc.2826

Keywords

CuO nanoparticles; Reactive oxygen species; Gene expression; Roots; Rice

Funding

  1. Qingdao Agricultural University [631014]
  2. Animal Embryo Engineering Center
  3. Central Laboratory of Qingdao Agricultural University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To evaluate the effect of CuO nanoparticles (NPs) on root growth, root reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, and the expression of 2 genes (OsCDC2 and OsCYCD) associated with root growth of Oryza sativa (rice), rice roots were treated with 5mg/L CuO NP suspension, 5mg/L CuO bulk particle suspension, and 0.27mg/L CuSO(4)5H(2)O solution, with distilled water as control. The results indicated that CuO NPs and Cu2+ severely inhibited the elongation and biomass of rice roots after 72-h exposure. Dyeing with 7-dichlorodihydrofluorescein-diacetate (DCFH-DA) showed that in all 3 treatment groups, the fluorescence was primarily located in the meristem zone, demonstrating that the meristem zone was where ROS were primarily generated. In addition, a significant increase in ROS was detected in the meristem zone of roots treated with the CuO NP suspension and the CuSO(4)5H(2)O solution, both of which greatly influenced the expression level of OsCDC2 and OsCYCD. The impact of Cu2+ on these 2 genes was smaller than that of CuO NPs. The Cu content in roots of rice after treatment with CuO NPs was much higher than that found after the other treatments, which indicated that CuO NPs may have been absorbed into root tissue. Collectively, these data suggest that growth inhibition, higher ROS production, and gene expression inhibition may be caused not only by the ions themselves, but also the NPs. Environ Toxicol Chem 2015;34:554-561. (c) 2014 SETAC

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available