Evaluation, ranking and selection of R&D projects by multiple experts: an evidential reasoning rule based approach
Published 2017 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Evaluation, ranking and selection of R&D projects by multiple experts: an evidential reasoning rule based approach
Authors
Keywords
R&D project evaluation, Evidential reasoning, Reliability, Nonlinear optimisation
Journal
SCIENTOMETRICS
Volume 111, Issue 3, Pages 1501-1519
Publisher
Springer Nature
Online
2017-03-01
DOI
10.1007/s11192-017-2278-1
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Research project evaluation and selection: an evidential reasoning rule-based method for aggregating peer review information with reliabilities
- (2015) Wei-dong Zhu et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- China's global growth in social science research: Uncovering evidence from bibliometric analyses of SSCI publications (1978–2013)
- (2015) Weishu Liu et al. Journal of Informetrics
- Feature report on China: a bibliometric analysis of China-related articles
- (2014) Weishu Liu et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Scientific peer review
- (2013) Lutz Bornmann ANNUAL REVIEW OF INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
- Evidential reasoning rule for evidence combination
- (2013) Jian-Bo Yang et al. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
- Evaluating R&D Projects as Investments by Using an Overall Ranking From Four New Fuzzy Similarity Measure-Based TOPSIS Variants
- (2013) Mikael Collan et al. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON FUZZY SYSTEMS
- An MAGDM Approach Combining Numerical Values with Uncertain Linguistic Information and Its Application in Evaluation of R&D Projects
- (2013) Xin-Bao Liu et al. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems
- Bias in peer review
- (2012) Carole J. Lee et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
- An introduction and survey of the evidential reasoning approach for multiple criteria decision analysis
- (2011) Dong-Ling Xu ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH
- An Approach to Multi-criteria Environmental Evaluation with Multiple Weight Assignment
- (2011) Boris Agarski et al. ENVIRONMENTAL MODELING & ASSESSMENT
- The prediction for listed companies’ financial distress by using multiple prediction methods with rough set and Dempster–Shafer evidence theory
- (2011) Zhi Xiao et al. KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS
- An ANP approach for R&D project evaluation based on interdependencies between research objectives and evaluation criteria
- (2010) Uk Jung et al. DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS
- A fuzzy robust evaluation model for selecting and ranking NPD projects using Bayesian belief network and weight-restricted DEA
- (2010) Tzu-An Chiang et al. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS
- Project selection for oil-fields development by using the AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods
- (2010) Morteza Pakdin Amiri EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS
- An integrated method for collaborative R&D project selection: Supporting innovative research teams
- (2010) Bo Feng et al. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS
- Scientometric indicators: peer-review, bibliometric methods and conflict of interests
- (2010) Primož Južnič et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- A fuzzy AHP application in government-sponsored R&D project selection
- (2006) Chi-Cheng Huang et al. OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
Find the ideal target journal for your manuscript
Explore over 38,000 international journals covering a vast array of academic fields.
SearchBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started