Is climate change controversy good for science? IPCC and contrarian reports in the light of bibliometrics

Title
Is climate change controversy good for science? IPCC and contrarian reports in the light of bibliometrics
Authors
Keywords
Climate change controversy, IPCC, Climate scepticism, Peer reviewed journals, Lead authors
Journal
SCIENTOMETRICS
Volume 112, Issue 3, Pages 1745-1759
Publisher
Springer Nature
Online
2017-06-22
DOI
10.1007/s11192-017-2440-9

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Reprint

Contact the author

Find the ideal target journal for your manuscript

Explore over 38,000 international journals covering a vast array of academic fields.

Search

Become a Peeref-certified reviewer

The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.

Get Started