4.5 Article

Mapping patent classifications: portfolio and statistical analysis, and the comparison of strengths and weaknesses

Journal

SCIENTOMETRICS
Volume 112, Issue 3, Pages 1573-1591

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-017-2449-0

Keywords

Patent; Map; Portfolio; CPC; Diversity; City; Comparisons; SWOT

Funding

  1. Academic Research Fund Tier 2 of the Singapore Ministry of Education
  2. European Research Council [715631]
  3. European Research Council (ERC) [715631] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Cooperative Patent Classifications (CPC) recently developed cooperatively by the European and US Patent Offices provide a new basis for mapping patents and portfolio analysis. CPC replaces International Patent Classifications (IPC) of the World Intellectual Property Organization. In this study, we update our routines previously based on IPC for CPC and use the occasion for rethinking various parameter choices. The new maps are significantly different from the previous ones, although this may not always be obvious on visual inspection. We provide nested maps online and a routine for generating portfolio overlays on the maps; a new tool is provided for difference maps between patent portfolios of organizations or firms. This is illustrated by comparing the portfolios of patents granted to two competing firms-Novartis and MSD-in 2016. Furthermore, the data is organized for the purpose of statistical analysis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available