4.7 Article

Effect of 2,4-epibrassinolide treatment on the postharvest quality and physiological metabolism of fresh daylily flower buds during storage

Journal

SCIENTIA HORTICULTURAE
Volume 226, Issue -, Pages 110-116

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2017.08.039

Keywords

Antioxidant enzyme; Brassinosteroids; Daylily flower buds; Lipid peroxidation; Plant hormone; Postharvest quality

Categories

Funding

  1. Chinese National Foundation of Nature and Science [31671926, 31671925]
  2. Special Fund for Agro-scientific Research in the Public Interest [201303088]
  3. PADA

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Flower buds of daylily are perishable, which limits their taste and consumer acceptability. This study aims to research the effects of 2,4-epibrassinolide (EBR) on the postharvest quality and physiological metabolism during senescence of fresh daylily flower buds during storage. The buds Were sprayed with an aqueous solution containing 0.5 mg L-1 EBR, dried for 1 h and then stored at 4 +/- 1 degrees C for 24 days. The results were as follows: EBR treatment decreased electrolyte leakage and malondialdehyde (MDA) content, suggesting maintaining the membrane integrity of daylily flower buds. EBR treatment inhibited the accumulation of H2O2 content, and increased the activity of antioxidant enzymes including superoxide dismutase, catalase, peroxidase and ascorbate peroxidase, suggesting active oxygen metabolism in the buds. EBR treatment enhanced gibberellic acid and zeatin riboside content, and reduced abscisic acid content, suggesting sustained balance of plant hormones. These results indicated that EBR treatment preserved postharvest quality including sensory quality, chlorophyll content and weight loss of daylily flower buds during storage. This study suggested that EBR treatment offers the potential to delay the senescence of stored daylily flower buds and extend their postharvest life.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available