4.7 Article

Mapping cation exchange capacity using a Veris-3100 instrument and invVERIS modelling software

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 599, Issue -, Pages 2156-2165

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.05.074

Keywords

Cation exchange capacity; Proximal soil sensing; Digital soil mapping; Quasi-3d inversion; Shrink-swell potential; Electrical conductivity

Funding

  1. Junta de Extremadura
  2. European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) [GR15050, TIC008]
  3. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development
  4. FEDER funds [INIA RTA2012-00018-C02-02, RTA 2013-00045-C04-02]
  5. CICYTEX [INIA RTA2012-00018-C02-02, RTA 2013-00045-C04-02]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The cation exchange capacity (CEC) is one of the most important soil properties as it influences soil's ability to hold essential nutrients. It also acts as an index of structural resilience. In this study, we demonstrate a method for 3-dimensional mapping of CEC across a study field in south-west Spain. We do this by establishing a linear regression (LR) between the calculated true electrical conductivity (sigma - mS/m) and measured CEC (cmol(+)/ kg) at various depths. We estimate a by inverting Veris-3100 data (ECa-mS/m) collected along 47 parallel transects spaced 12 m apart. We invert the ECa data acquired from both shallow (0-03 m) and deep (0-0.9 m) array configurations, using a quasi-three-dimensional inversion algorithm (invVeris V1.1). The CEC data was acquired at 40 locations and from the topsoil (0-03 m), subsurface (0.3-0.6 m) and subsoil (0.6-0.9 m). The best LR between nand CEC was achieved using S2 inversion algorithm using a damping factor (lambda) = 18. The LR (CEC = 1.77 + 033 x sigma) had a large coefficient of determination (R-2 = 0.89). To determine the predictive capability of the LR, we validated the model using a cross-validation. Given the high accuracy (root-mean-square-error IRMSEI = 1.69 cmol(+)/kg), small bias (mean-error [ME] = -0.00 cmol(+)/kg) and large coefficient of determination (R-2 = 0.88) and Lin's concordance (0.94), between measured and predicted CEC and at various depths, we conclude we were well able to predict the CEC distribution in topsoil and the subsurface. However, the predictions made in the subsoil were poor due to limited data availability in areas where ECa changed rapidly from small to large values. In this regard, improvements in prediction accuracy can be achieved by collection of ECa in more closely spaced transects, particularly in areas where ECa varies over short spatial scales. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available