4.7 Article

Operationalizing safe operating space for regional social-ecological systems

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 584, Issue -, Pages 673-682

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.01.095

Keywords

Safe operating space; System dynamic; Social-ecological system and sustainable development

Funding

  1. joint NERC/ESRC interdisciplinary PhD studentthip [1223260]
  2. University of Southampton
  3. SANDEE PhD dissertation
  4. project ESPA-DELTAS 'Assessing health, livelihoods, ecosystem services and poverty, alleviation in populous deltas' - Ecosystem Services for Poverty Alleviation Programme (ESPA) [NE/J002755/1]
  5. project BF -DELTAS 'Catalyzing action towards stistainability of deltaic systems with an integrated modelling framework for risk assessment' -Belmont Forum
  6. Department for International Development (DFID)
  7. Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC)
  8. Natural Environment Research Council (NERC)
  9. Economic and Social Research Council [1223260] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study makes a first attempt to operationalize the safe operating space concept at a regional scale by considering the complex dynamics (e.g. non-linearity, feedbacks, and interactions) within a systems dynamic model (SD). We employ the model to explore eight 'what if' scenarios based on well-known challenges (e.g. climate change) and current policy debates (e.g. subsidy withdrawal). The findings show that the social-ecological system in the Bangladesh delta may move beyond a safe operating space when a withdrawal of a 50% subsidy for agriculture is combined with the effects of a 2 degrees C temperature increase and sea level rise. Further reductions in upstream river discharge in the Ganges would push the system towards a dangerous zone once a 3.5 degrees C temperature increase was reached. The social-ecological system in Bangladesh delta may be operated within a safe space by: 1) managing feedback (e.g. by reducing production costs) and the slow biophysical variables (e.g. temperature, rainfall) to increase the long-term resilience, 2) negotiating for transboundasy water resources, and 3) revising global policies (e.g. withdrawal of subsidy) that negatively impact at regional scales. This study demonstrates how the concepts of tipping points, limits to adaptations, and boundaries for sustainable development may be defined in real world social-ecological systems. (C) 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available