4.8 Article

Regeneration of Commercial SCR Catalysts: Probing the Existing Forms of Arsenic Oxide

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 49, Issue 16, Pages 9971-9978

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b02257

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21325731, 21407088, 51478241]
  2. National High-Tech Research and Development (863) Program of China [2013AA065401, 2013AA065304]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2013M530643]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To investigate the poisoning and regeneration of SCR catalysts, fresh and arsenic-poisoned commercial V2O5-WO3/TiO2 catalysts are researched in the context of deactivation mechanisms and regeneration technology. The results indicate that the forms of arsenic oxide on the poisoned catalyst are related to the proportion of arsenic (As) on the catalyst. When the surface coverage of (V+W+As) is lower than 1, the trivalent arsenic species (As-III) is the major component, and this species prefers to permeate into the bulkphase channels. However, at high As concentrations, pentavalent arsenic species (As-IV) cover the surface of the catalyst. Although both arsenic species lower the NOx conversion, they affect the formation of N2O differently. In particular, N2O production is limited when trivalent arsenic species predominate, which may be related to As2O3 clogging the pores of the catalyst. In contrast, the pentavalent arsenic oxide species (As2O5) possess several As OH groups. These As-OH groups could not only enhance the ability of the catalyst to become reduced, but also provide several Bronsted acid sites with weak thermal stability that promote the formation of N2O. Finally, although our novel Ca(NO3)(2)-based regeneration method cannot completely remove As2O3 from the micropores of the catalyst, this approach can effectively wipe off surface arsenic oxides without a significant loss of the catalyst's active components.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available