4.8 Article

Diminished Swelling of Cross-Linked Aromatic Oligoamide Surfaces Revealing a New Fouling Mechanism of Reverse-Osmosis Membranes

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 49, Issue 11, Pages 6815-6822

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es504325d

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Water Authority of Israel [4500721123]
  2. USATD Middle East Regional Cooperation (MERC) Program [M29-048]
  3. Blaustein Center for Scientific Cooperation, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
  4. Israel Council of Higher Education (VATAT)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Swelling of the active layer of reverse osmosis (RO) membranes has an important effect on permeate water flux. The effects of organic- and biofouling on the swelling of the RO membrane active layer and the consequent changes of permeate flux are examined here. A cross-linked aromatic oligoamide film that mimics the surface chemistry of an RO polyamide membrane was synthesized stepwise on gold-coated surfaces. Foulant adsorption to the oligoamide film and its swelling were measured with a quartz crystal microbalance, and the effects of fouling on the membranes performance were evaluated. The foulants were extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) extracted from fouled RO membranes and organic compounds of ultrafiltration permeate (UFP) from a membrane bioreactor used to treat municipal wastewater. The adsorbed foulants affected the swelling of the cross-linked oligoamide film differently. EPS had little effect on the swelling of the oligoamide film, whereas UFP significantly impaired swelling. Permeate flux declined more rapidly under UFP fouling than it did under EPS. Foulant adsorption was shown to diminish swelling of the aromatic oligoamide surfaces. Among the already known RO membrane fouling mechanisms, a novel RO fouling mechanism is proposed, in which foulant-membrane interactions hinder membrane swelling and thus increase hydraulic resistance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available