Promote scientific integrity via journal peer review data

Impact of interventions to improve the quality of peer review of biomedical journals: a systematic review and meta-analysis

(2016) Rachel Bruce et al.   BMC Medicine

Has open data arrived at theBritish Medical Journal (BMJ)? An observational study

(2016) Anisa Rowhani-Farid et al.   BMJ Open

Meta-research: Evaluation and Improvement of Research Methods and Practices

(2015) John P. A. Ioannidis et al.   PLOS BIOLOGY

The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era

(2015) Vincent Larivière et al.   PLoS One

How should medical science change?

(2014) Sabine Kleinert et al.   LANCET

The N-Pact Factor: Evaluating the Quality of Empirical Journals with Respect to Sample Size and Statistical Power

(2014) R. Chris Fraley et al.   PLoS One

Citation bias favoring statistically significant studies was present in medical research

(2013) Anne-Sophie Jannot et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY

"Hardly worth the effort"? Medical journals' policies and their editors' and publishers' views on trial registration and publication bias: quantitative and qualitative study

(2013) E. Wager et al.   BMJ-British Medical Journal

Retracted Science and the Retraction Index

(2011) Ferric C. Fang et al.   INFECTION AND IMMUNITY