4.8 Article

Integrated Control of Emission Reductions, Energy-Saving, and Cost-Benefit Using a Multi-Objective Optimization Technique in the Pulp and Paper Industry

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 49, Issue 6, Pages 3636-3643

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es504740h

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71103110]
  2. National Science and Technology Major Project for Water Pollution Control and Treatment [2013ZX07504-004]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Reduction of water pollutant emissions and energy consumption is regarded as a key environmental objective for the pulp and paper industry. The paper develops a bottom-up model called the Industrial Water Pollutant Control and Technology Policy (IWPCTP) based on all industrial technology simulation system and multi, constraint technological optimization. Five policy scenarios covering the business as usual (BAU) scenario, the structural adjustment (SA) scenario, the cleaner technology promotion (CT) scenario, the end-treatment of pollutants (EOP) scenario, and the coupling measures (CM) scenario have been set to describe future policy measures related to the development of the pulp and paper industry from 2010-2020. The outcome of thiS study indicates that the energy saving amount under the CT scenario is the largest, while that under the SA scenario is the smallest. Under the CT scenario, savings by 2620 include 70 kt/year, of chemical oxygen demand (COD) emission reductions and savings of 7443 kt of standard coal, 539.7 ton/year: of ammonia nitrogen (NH4-N) emission reductions, and savings of 7444 kt of standard coal. Taking emission reductions, energy savings, and cost benefit into consideration, cleaner technologies like highly efficient pulp washing, dry and wet feedstock preparation, and horizontal continuous cooking, medium and high consistency pulping And wood dry feedstock preparation are recommended.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available